ABSTRACT
Introduction: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but potentially debilitating thrombosis affecting 3-4 cases per million adults in the United States. Risk factors are thought similar to venous thrombosis, but there is little epidemiologic data corroborating this assertion. Concern about a possible association between the Janssen (Johnson and Johnson) and Oxford-AztraZenaca COVID-19 vaccines and cases of CVST resulted in increased global attention to this condition. Thus, large epidemiological assessment of the risk factors, treatment and outcomes of CVST are needed. Objective(s): Estimate the distributions of risk factors antecedent to CVST diagnosis, report CVST treatments in clinical practice, and potential sequelae of CVST in a large retrospective cohort of adults with CVST in the United States. Method(s): MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental administrative databases were employed to assess CVST diagnosed between 2011 and 2019 in the U.S. Validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes and receipt of an outpatient anticoagulant (either oral or subcutaneous anticoagulant) prescription within 30 days of the ICD code identified incident CVST. Antecedent clinical characteristics, treatments, and sequelae of CVST were identified using inpatient, outpatient, and prescription data. For outcomes, proportions and incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, stratified by sex. Result(s): We identified 1,869 CVST patients. Of these 1,314 (70%) were female, with 200 (10%) events identified as a pregnancy-related CVST. The average age was 41 years for females and 48 years for men. Among women, 24.7% were on hormonal therapy (oral contraceptive, estrogen, and progestin) prior to diagnosis. Men had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, such as diabetes (15% men vs. 9% women) and cancer (19% men vs. 10% women). Oral anticoagulant (OAC) use was the most common treatment for CVST in both men (88%) and women (85%) and did not vary by sex. Use of procedures to treat CVST, optic nerve fenestration and catheter directed thrombolysis, were 0.5% and 4.1%, respectively. The most common sequela after CVST was incidence of intracranial hypertension (Incidence: 4.2 per 100 person-years;95% CI: 3.3, 5.1) and palliedema was rare. Conclusion(s): Overall, a majority of CVST patients were women of reproductive age. Our findings suggest a potential association with both endogenous (pregnancy) and exogenous (oral contraceptives, HRT) hormones which needs further study. In our sample, CVST was managed with oral anticoagulants, regardless of sex, and intracranial hypertension was elevated following CVST. This large claims-based analysis is a descriptive insight into the risk factors and management of CVST, a rare and debilitating condition.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Mechanistic research suggests that diabetes may increase susceptibility to infection. However, few epidemiologic studies have examined this association. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that adults with diabetes will have a higher risk for infection compared to those without diabetes. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of diabetes and incident hospitalization with infection using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. We used Cox regression models with adjustments for demographics, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic and kidney functioning measures. Diabetes status at baseline (1987-1989) was defined as a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or non-fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL, or self-report of a diagnosis of diabetes, or current diabetes medication use. First hospitalization with any infection and specific types of infections (respiratory, urinary, foot, sepsis, and postoperative wound) were ascertained from ICD-9 codes in hospital discharge records, with follow-up to September 30, 2015. Results: We included 13,356 participants (mean age, 55;26% black;54% female). During a median follow-up of 18.8 years, there were 7,791 incident hospitalizations with infection. Compared to those without diabetes at baseline, those with diabetes had a greater risk for hospitalization with any infection (adjusted HR: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.45-1.66], Table ). Results were generally consistentacross infection type, and differences were especially pronounced for foot infections (adjusted HR:6.35 [95% CI: 5.27-7.64]). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened interest in the link between diabetes and susceptibility to infection. Our study suggests diabetes confers significant risk for infection.Enhancing diabetes prevention and management may reduce infection-related morbidity and mortality.